By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. So I say fine and have my guys ready to launch just in case. AllAmericanNegr0 8 oct 2021. 99% of the possible targets on the field were in fact baddies and had the free to kill on them. ODogX 6 may 2020 692 27 *remembers what happened in Dubai* BUKLAU_CHANG 6 may 2020 618 46 Should politicians be held accountable for the wars they start? Should gamers be accountable in-game war crimes? And like someone pointed out earlier, it's not like many countries that engage in combat actions often actually follow their own rules of engagement anyway. Here's a rundown of the legal situation as the international community looks for ways to hold Russia accountable for the killings, widespread destruction and human rights abuses that have been. Seems interesting to be aware of, although not applicable (or is it?) This is something military games have been telling us for many years. Fun fact: we deliver faster than Amazon. In Battlefield 5 or Call of Duty 27, it may not be so simple to dismiss the sight of a photo-realistic person lying in the dust, eyes rolling back, limbs spasming. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said Sunday the U.S. sees evidence of war crimes by Russia in Ukraine, adding to mounting accusations against Russia as the International Criminal Court opens its . These days, if you accidentally (or otherwise) shoot a civilian or comrade in a military shooter, you'll probably get a 'mission failed' message and a one-way trip back to the last checkpoint. ItsTickleTipson 5 feb 2022. maybe games really ARE too realistic =P. We are, though, surely heading into an era where gamers will have to take greater responsibility for their actions if only because the visual fidelity will be there to splatter our violent failings across the screen in HD detail. IE 11 is not supported. Remember, no Russian. By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. If you kill an enemy combatant in real life, then t-bag the shit outta his/her face, is that a crime? The people in the world who are committing the majority of the war crimes, have also never even seen a gaming unit, and a Red Cross is nothing more than an aiming reference and resupply point. Ace Combat players: #should #gamers #accountable #game #war #ace #combat. Our intention is not to spoil players enjoyment by for example, interrupting the game with pop-up messages listing legal provisions or lecturing gamers on the law of armed conflict. Crime and Punishment . I play Stellaris and in that game I literally enslave, genocide, displace entire species and one of the things I can do is eat them/work them to death. Gamers in their right should play video games however they want it and when they want it. Doesn't seem like an outrageous demand to me. Of which Starsector is not. Arma 2: The Red Cross believes that as video games become ever more realistic, they should also adhere to international rules of warfare. I mean why put your self out online if you have such a weak self image if what someone you may never meet or know could influence your feelings or make you day or even a minute of your day bad , why ? By which I mean, Ive never committed a genocide. Lol. nup thats the check if they are really dead test, ^^^^ no, but getting left with blue balls after a pillow fight with one of the girls. The International Committee of the Red Cross has confirmed that it won't prosecute gamers for participating in pretend war crimes, but that doesn't mean it wants to leave the topic alone. Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. It "sort of" exists already in some effect. In the case of an armed conflict not of an international character, serious violations of article 3 common to the four Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, namely, any of the following acts committed against persons taking no active part in the hostilities, including members of armed forces who have laid down their arms and those placed hors de combat by sickness, wounds, detention or any other cause: Violence to life and person, in particular murder of all kinds, mutilation, cruel treatment and torture; The passing of sentences and the carrying out of executions without previous judgement pronounced by a regularly constituted court, affording all judicial guarantees which are generally recognized as indispensable. gamers are sub-human. There's just as much war crimes done in CoD series as in GTA, People Playground, *gun shots* *explosions* *carnage* *destroying the flesh with thrusters* *torture* *genocide* *brutality* *injecting literal acid into humans* *drowning* *reviving* *repeat* *lava* *crushing* *stretching* *flamethrower* *chainsaw* *so much more*. If you look at the Guardian article, Red Cross is suggesting that videogames be more realistic and have in-game consequences for committing war crimes: And Red Cross says they don't want to ruin anyone's fun; they just want "realistic" war games to address the same political and social consequences of real wars. Plenty of warfare though. It may not display this or other websites correctly. So first off, this article is from October of 2013. wowall the other shit to improve upon in our society and the snowflakes choose this topic. It's not actually advocating that gamers themselves suffer some kind of actual punishment for committing in-game warcrimes. Author Topic: Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? Yes gamers should be held responsible. Quote: The International Red Cross has told the BBC that it wants military-themed video games to adhere to real-life international laws. But then if the consequences of illegal operations are subsumed into the gameplay mechanics i.e. That's how I read it, and honestly? The ICRC's Franois Snchaud justified his organisation's request for consequences, saying "it's very difficult to make the distinction between real footage and the footage you can get from video games." Let's start by taking back our Language! In a BBC news report earlier this week, however, Francois Senechaud from the International Committee of the Red Cross told a reporter that, due to the increasing verisimilitude between first-person shooters and real-life combat, games should start to abide by the international laws of armed conflict. You can change your mind at any time by updating your preferences or unsubscribing from the footer of any email you receive from us, or by contacting us at office@forceswatch.net. What the Red Cross wants to see then is the player being penalised for carrying out such actions as willfully killing civilians or torturing enemy combatants, both of which are punishable under international law. Video games can be violent, and thanks to all the shooting, maiming, and killing going on in many titles moralists of all stripes have deemed them a Very Serious Problem for young people. That sounds like a really fun video game. I suggest folks read the article before going "OMG PC" or "OMG IDIOTS." Ukraine, the U.S and its allies accuse Russian forces of targeting civilians indiscriminately, but Russia has consistently denied doing so. High Rock - Geographically cutoff from the rest of the empire. The question is, how feasible are the ICRC's aims and will players really take on board the lessons about humanitarian law? I don't think anything like this would ever go in, but I'd still be intrigued by a game that did have more than just "go pew pew pew everything" as part of the gameplay. The ability to name characters in titles like Cannon Fodder and XCOM, for example, provided a heightened level of emotional attachment for many players. If you look at the Guardian article, Red Cross is suggesting that videogames be more realistic and have in-game consequences for committing war crimes: The ICRC is suggesting that as in real life, these games should include virtual consequences for people's actions and decisions. [History] Keith Stuart / The Guardian - "Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes?" (2013) KotakuInAction Original. How the left is pushing us toward civil war, and how this has worked in the past. It's not interested in excising the offending scenarios from games entirely, arguing that "sanitizing videogames of such acts is not realistic" given such atrocities do occur in real conflict. Gamers should be rewarded for respecting the law of armed conflict and there should be virtual penalties for serious violations of the law of armed conflict, in other words war crimes. Never listen to games journalists. Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? Just that Call of Duty-esque games, which are realistic representations of modern conflicts should address the fact their are consequences for your actions. They should go check out EVE Online! In a BBC news report earlier this week, however, Francois Senechaud from the International Committee of the Red Cross told a reporter that, due to the increasing verisimilitude between first-person shooters and real-life combat, games should start to abide by the international laws of armed conflict. I shot my team mate in the ass in Arma III and ran over all the civilians in the first grand theft auto. It's still dumb. In a BBC news report earlier this week, however, Francois Senechaud from the International Committee of the Red Cross told a reporter that, due to the increasing verisimilitude between first-person shooters and real-life combat, games should start to abide by the international laws of armed conflict. We would like to see the law of armed conflict integrated into the games so that players have a realistic experience and deal first-hand with the dilemmas facing real combatants on real battlefields. Need for speed players Blade and sorcery players . On the other hand, the ICRC feels players found "respecting the law of armed conflict" should be rewarded. The International Committee of the Red Cross have called for video games to punish crimes committed in battle by adhering to real-life international war conventions. I just wanted the Sudetenland. Russia denies it engages in illegal attacks but proof of any use of illegal weaponry such as cluster bombs and any targeting of civilians or civilian buildings like schools and hospitals is already being collated. Next thing you know, the Red Cross will want to require psych evals for people that have thoughts contrary to their rules. In the video above, Bohemia's CEO Marek Spanel describes how Arma III copes with the breach of conflict law, saying "if you do [attack friendlies or civilians] with friendly troops around, they will attack you.". if you mean people hurting other people's feelings I say its too dam bad its a game suck it up . Should actors be accountable for a murder in their movie? October 7, 2013 in Off-Topic Discussion. So I take out a Tristan vs his Thorax and we begin. What the public fails to realize is that video games are big stress relievers for a lot of folk, myself included. If all transgressions automatically lead to failure, it's a zero-sum game that invites only functional thinking. and our Schadenfreude420 7 oct 2021. Gamers should be rewarded for respecting the law of armed conflict and there should be virtual penalties for serious violations of the law of armed conflict, in other words war crimes. When they start filing sex abuse charges for watching porn hub.some of you guys are real trouble. Furthermore, the ICRC statement makes clear that it is not interested in other genres it is concentrating on combat games that depict and concentrate on contemporary battlefields. And it wants players to understand the consequences of such an action, not just in terms of the score or progress, but in terms of the real world of warfare the one that all military games reflect and fetishise.. His claim may be valid: in 2011, British broadcaster ITVused footage from video gameArma II to illustrate purported paramilitary action. JavaScript is disabled. Is this feasible? Article (with reader comments) from The Guardian. Saryn standing trial for his war crimes as the corpses sue him for damages. April 22, 2020, 10:47:38 PM . I can just see it now, police knock on the door," hello mam is your 8 year old son Johnny home? Something that I think more of the youth playing CoD need. And if a person can not make the difference between reality and a game then they need help from a psychiatrist and as such would not be able to be held accountable for the "War crimes" they did in a game. Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? Snipers Hide is a community of Snipers of all kinds, focusing on long range shooting, accuracy, and ballistics. Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. Most civilized countries have laws regarding war crimes that are very specific and quite frankly - whomever thought this up has no concept of reality. I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Buddy, that's amature stuff compared to r/RimWorld. Gamers should be rewarded for respecting the law of armed conflict and there should be virtual penalties for serious violations of the law of armed conflict, in other words war crimes. He added that they were not concerned with fantasy games, but those that mimic situations that might be seen in current armed conflicts, known as first person shooters although he declined to name specific titles. lol what the fu-- crimes in a game how does that work or do you mean like pita throwing a fit and snowflakes melting ? Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. I remember my first go on Taitos explosive arcade title Operation Wolf it was the late-80s and this frenzied blast-em-up, with its jungle environment and hostage rescue missions, was clearly gunning for a generation of Rambo II fanatics. Just a 'Hey, you know what would be nice? The best of TommyKay clips and funny moments in one place. Pages: 1 [2] Author Topic: Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? Monster_Slayer 1 may 2020. TikTok video from TommyKay (@tommykaydaily): "Should gamers go to jail for ingame war crimes? It's also pretty terrifying that there's people out there seriously considering proposing something like this, though little surprises me when many of those in positions of influence and power turn out to be out of touch with reality and/or corrupt. In Spec Ops: the Line, three soldiers are stranded in a wrecked Dubai facing a crowd of angry locals and must decide whether to shoot or face death. Blockland Forums Home; Help; Login; Register; Blockland Forums . That's all I'll say. I mean saved in the last 6 years, Every Minecraft player would go to jail for villager trafficking, I may have committed Genozide in multiple villages and also took war prisoners, creepy is Im not even the worst, Ummm . Steam Community: Hearts of Iron IV. It adds immersion. No single, globally accepted treaty lists all war crimes. It doesn't sound like they mean to court martial people playing Halo in real life. Dont shoot the civilians. I don't even think that's what the ICRC wants it doesn't want moral doubt to arise purely through aesthetics, it wants designers to think about international law, and about how warfare should operate. "It is a war crime to attack a nuclear power plant," the embassy said on its official Twitter feed on March 4. 1.8K 106. This topic makes me laugh. Without an -actual- crime, I don't see how anyone could be held accountable for war crimes in this manner. Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2: shootouts often occur in areas where civilians are in the line of fire. Should gamers be accountable in-game war crimes - funny, gamers, accountable, in-game, crimes. It's a game, nothing "real, or realistic" about it. It sounds to me more like some guy's personal vendetta against gamers. This is a reminder we also have a Discord server where you can share templates, request them or just have a nice chat, level up and unlock server perks. Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? THE Should gamers be accountable for in-game war crimes? What you won't get is a military tribunal and a dishonorable discharge. ? It doesn't matter how realistic a game ends up being, if people can't learn to separate reality from a simulation/video game then they don't have much business getting their hands upon them. I also think more realism is always good in games. Gamers should be rewarded for in game war crimes. "It's difficult to make out the difference between real footage and the footage you get from video games.". AAA Hard Surface integrator for Characters, Concept artist and Asset artist responsible for: - military enemy characters. The ICRC is suggesting that as in real life, these games should include virtual consequences for people's actions and decisions. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns. PhantOS. These clips are all from funny, embarassing, awkward, fails, wins, cringey, memey, etc. Privacy Policy. When I read the thread title, I was thinking this was a play of words on match gamers. For the purpose of this Statute, crime against humanity means any of the following acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack: Deportation or forcible transfer of population. Asking for a friend. Press J to jump to the feed. coalition of 228 of the society's members this week urged a revision, 'Grand Theft Auto Online' off to a bumpy start, Video Games can help kids think and focus. Quit trying to run with 'video games teach kids violence', and blame bad parenting and lack of accountability in this day and age. #should #gamers #accountable #game #war #persona #sie. And Red Cross says they don't want to ruin anyone's fun; they just want "realistic" war games to address the same political and social consequences of real wars. The ICRC is focusing strictly on games that "simulate real-war situations." Titles like Fable, Heavy Rain, Walking Dead and Dishonored all provide different paths for a player depending on their moral decisions during play and because the action is combined with a confirming narrative element, the meaning and weight of transgression can come through. Yeah there is some talent gettin about there Uff this lockdowns hittin hard but on the upside it aint quite a gulag where u need to pay someone in food to get inspiration to keep world peace. There is a big line between reality and the virtual world and for example, I cannot remember a video game shooter where I'm gunning civilians. (Read 1802 times) Epicduke. sheesh. Butfrom a serious perspective this article refers to realistic conflict and it makes absolute sense that people, especially young impressionable people are made to realise that actions in the real world have consequences. . Press J to jump to the feed. Ukraine has also accused Russia of genocide, listed. No, being a gamer should make you exempt from punishments for war crimes committed IRL. That Red Cross person should understand that it is just a game and not reality. The jury of Tenno looking in disbelief as the defense lawyer starts committing more war crimes against the plaintiffs to prove Saryn's innocence meanwhile the Judge is either joining in on the war crimes or died instantly. What you wont get is a military tribunal and a dishonorable discharge. 6. If governments aren't being held accountable for war crimes anymore, why should people playing video games?
Aarp Sweepstakes 2022,
Tesla Stem High School Admission Rate,
Articles S
