I think the bokeh won me over with the cat, as well as the fact that I like animals; the case for the duck was the same. I'll walk you through all this inc. If you're using or are looking to buy the Samyang or Rokinon 135mm F/2, please let me know what you're imaging with it or any questions you may have in the comment section below. I understand the optical design is quite old. What is it like shooting with one today? In the middle of the OM System lineup, the OM-5 promises yesterday's top-tier performance in a lighter, more compact body. The model I use feels solid and the barrel is constructed with metal. Image quality, weight and value for money. I have used the canon 70-200 f2.8L ii and also the 100-400 f4.5/5.6 L with excellent results. On a full frame body, I rely upon this lens and it does not disappoint. I want to see the bokeh and the sharpness at 100% mag, don't care about the photos. There was no reason to test any other because, when stopped down to 49mm, F6.1, this lens is simply perfect, comparable to any APO on the market. Finally, although we don't explicitly test for it, we have to note that this lens' bokeh (rendering of out-of-focus objects) is really excellent as well. My goal for this article was to show some great example photos and share some ideas for projects this lens is a good fit for. My 24-70L needs to be stopped down to f5.6 to begin to match the sharpness of my 135L at f2.0 (the test shots were of the portrait of Andrew Jackson on a $20 bill). I'm not a fan of the large hood. My copy is 12-years-old and still delivers at over 75 weddings a year. Let's dig in. When I was teaching photography in 70's at a junior college, I critiqued students photos, but I never did so harshly. Will this ever get old? However, I find the process tedious, and prefer single, manually guided, long exposures which seem to have deeper colors. Perhaps this impression of unreal sharpness is strengthened by the contrast to the extremely creamy bokeh you typically get in the same photo. Why take a step back from 250 to sit between the RedCat and the 24-105? Micael Widell is a photography enthusiast based in Stockholm, Sweden. Take care not to confuse this lens with the 200mm F4 SMC Takumar 6x7 which has a different optical configuration, and which I have never tested. This lens has only two drawbacks. The Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC is one of the most affordable and practical lenses for astrophotography on the market. Canon EOS 60Da with the Rokinon 135mm F/2 lens. Begun in 1975, the Pentax K-mount legacy continues to this day. Samyang 135 f/2 astrophotography gallery Below some pictures I made using Samyang 135 lens with QHY163 mono camera and iOptron Smart EQ Pro mount. This criticism refers to rare cases when your main subject matter is flat and completely inside the limited DOF range while the rest of the image is outside. I will say that at F/4 this lens is extremely sharp corner to corner when used on my 60Da. After several years off, the venerable magazine has held a public open call photo contest and selected nine finalists and one winning image for its 'Photos of the Year.'. Chris referred to the Canon RF 16mm F2.8 STM as 'a little gem'! Well, if you consider downloading a lens image from https://www.bhphotovideo.com, and photoshop it on top of my photos to cover mistakes, and demonstrate sharpness of a lens with a jpeg that is way oversharpened; if you call knowledge that "the long focal length compresses the background" , If you call blurr a bokeh just because it sounds better, and so on 1000 words would not be enough to point out what a mess this review is Then you are right, I absolutely do not know as much as he does. Even if I wanted a 135mm lens (and the 70-200mm f/2.8 is more versatile) it would be the Nikon 135mm f/2 DC lens. If 135mm f2 works for you, then fine. I have heard others mention that this lens has a plasticky build quality, but I believe this aspect has been improved. However, stepping outside to polar align a small star tracker and attach a DSLR and lens is quick and painless. If you have the 1.8 version, way to go. Hate these presumptuous kinds of articles and headlines. For some objects a reflection can take away from the photo because it covers interesting details of the object (Think Alnitak in the Horsehead Nebula). Prime means that this lens is fixed at 135mm, it is not a zoom lens that allows for focal length adjustments. Great question Scott I think it depends on the image. (purchased for $1,100), reviewed October 5th, 2008 Well, for me. Bokeh is buttery smooth, best you can get from a 135mm. No more inside shooting with flash! The foolproof image seems to be more a case of how a bright fuzzy cluttered moving background can completely detach from the offset dark subject matter and overwhelm it. Besides lack of IS, the only major issue I have with this lens is flare. (purchased for $900), reviewed August 22nd, 2008 image quality wise it is by far one the sharpest lenses ive ever used. Contrasty, saturated, nice colours. f/2, fast-accurate-silent focus, (relatively) small & light, super sharp!! There is some controversy about the use of UV filters, but I found that a good UV filter significantly improves contrast, sharpens small star images, and reduces chromatic aberration. By the way, I still enjoy using my very sharp Sears 135mm, PKA mount lens. Digital camera types . And as this article clearly shows, no amount of blurr will make a poorly composed photo good. (And cost less too). Built quality is wonderful, focus ring is well-damped. Lots of older lenses no longer satisfy. Back in 1999, Sony released the F505, their first digital camera with a Carl Zeiss lens. Whats the best camera for around $2000? Also Nikon DC 135mm f/2 is a great lens, a little better than 135mm Canon My only complaint about this lens is that the depth of the lens shade forces me to remove the shade in order to remove or replace the lens cap (my hands are fairly large). If you don't like that article that's your right as a member. Olympus 75mm f1.82. This lens has the Pentax K bayonet mount, and requires the K-EOS adapter for attachment to Canon EOS cameras. Ive spent a handful of nights testing this lens in my Bortle Scale Class 6/7 backyard, and my results live up to the hype it gets in terms of astrophotography performance. Last time I used a 135mm f2 was decades ago on a Canon F1. I do know, however, that I can take an equally framed photo I've shot with my Canon kit lens, both zoomed to 100% I run circles around this guy. I took a few shots with the lens on my way home after buying it. The lens is so crisp that the diaphragm blade pattern is visible on point light sources shot at large aperature. I don't know about other photographers but I do not have many applications for this focal length. (purchased for $800), reviewed March 15th, 2010 Don't know what the young man uses as his camera, and if he has tried to keep the noise under control, or even tried to focus on the eyes of the mallard, or the cat (their eyes are not truly in focus). What you need to know is the author is a hobbyist and hands his images over to px500, the bottom of the barrel so of course he is impressed, he doesnt use top flight gear day in, day out to earn his pay. The EOS R6 II arrives in one of the most competitive parts of the market, facing off against some very capable competition. Simple fact is the Samyang 135/2 is a remarkably good lens for the price, and it offers a set of optical characteristics that typically cost 2-4x more. Can't argue with your reasoning, Juksu, about the framing of the article, but just stopping by to say I really liked that cat picture, am shopping for a new smartphone, struck that this type of photo is in another league - all newbie observations, of course, which sort of supports your thoughts that an article like this would be better framed as a "Love this new long lens stuff" sort of thing. Great for portraits. Together they still weight less than any modern 135mm :>. The first telephoto lens of choice, especially recommended for beginners, is the 135mm F2.5 SMC Pentax. When I was on my way home after purchasing my first 135mm lens (the Samyang/Rokinon one) I took a few quick snapshots just to try out the lens. The Olympus Zuiko 180/2.8 and 100/2.8 impressed me in the 1980s, but in the digital era they are not so sharp. If anything the argument in favor of even smaller and lighter 85/1.4s (like the 600g Sigma DN) is stronger than ever, and I say that as someone that loves shooting at 135-150mm. Large emission nebulae like the California Nebula (pictured below) are a great choice for this focal length. If you buy a nifty fifty or a 100mm macro lens you simply cannot go wrongyou will get a great and handy lens for your money, with great image quality. And they like circles (no ellipses or polygons) and smooth colour (no hard edges, no onion rings). As it is it is earns a 9. Check out Focusing a wide open F/2 lens is demanding of the optics, especially on a field of stars in the night sky. Star parties or dark sky excursions are another great time to use a camera lens in place of the telescope. The extent of this influence lies mainly in photographer's perception and creativity.As all arts photography may serve given needs due to numerous reasons with the resulting integrity of the work not necessarily suggesting art.The photographic gear (from lens cleaning tissues up to s/w) is just the tool(s) of a photographer in order to produce its work. Sharp but smooth at the same time. I enjoied the use of this lens many years before the DSLR. "If you are a Nikon user, of course have a look at the Nikon AF Nikkor 135mm f/2D DC and compare it to the other lenses mentioned in this article. If the title had been: "Testing My First Telephoto and LOVING IT!!!!!!!. Valerio, I sold my Canon Lens because in Nikon Lens there is a Defocus control option, very usefull in a daylight photos, as portrait. I loved the Nikon 80-400G for a year, or so, and then found everything with it wrong, and got rid of it. (purchased for $860), reviewed March 9th, 2017 That's a cheap, fun date for AP. Technical Specifications Looking for specific info? Im getting a samyang to use with my 60D. The lens hood is not petal-shaped, which is great news for those using this lens for astrophotography. My Canon EOS 60Da with the Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 mounted to a Fornax Mounts LighTrack II. I should mention that I have only tested this full-frame lens using my astrophotography DSLRs, all of which are crop-sensor camera bodies. The second best, is the Hoya Pro One Digital MC UV(0) filter. There are, of course, outlierssuch as the legendary unicorn lens Canon EF 200mm F2but that one isn't a great alternative unless you are cool with spending $5,700 and carrying around something about as wieldy as a fire hydrant. The 135mm f2.8 in particular can take amazing photos of the brighter deep sky objects with about 1 second time . Focusing should be done on moderately bright stars using the 10x magnified Live View. After the first exposure in M mode, the camera throws an error saying Error please press the shutter button again. For comparison, no other lens I know of would earn more than 8/10. A tiny bit of fringing, but that would only be noticed by pixel-peepers. One way to combat potential soft images and chasing perfect focus all night is to stop the lens down to F/2.8 or even F/4. Amazing for portraits, easily fast enough for indoor sports. These are affordably available on eBay, and result in perfectly round star images, the way nature intended them to be. See the full-size version on Astrobin. AF is accurate and very fast. Stage photography is another good use for the 135 L. I am not really looking at buying anything else, though. Besides, adding IS would mean adding extra elements and that would very likely reduce the image quality. It is a heavy lens. Also, I used to have a Nikon 180/2.8 ED IF AF and 300/4 ED IF AF. Did anybody use this lens for DSLR astrophoto? Now I wonder why people are never happy even on 3rd day of a new year :) Come on guys just think "Micael Widell" was working over holiday period to publish this free article ;). It is worth of it's price?Any links to astrophotos with this lens?Thanks. For portraits and with a high MP body I'd be more inclined than ever to just go 85mm, and for other uses it's hard to pass up the zooms' versatility, but I still there's still room for 135s in some kits and some formats. As you can see, the magnification of the lens used will dictate the type of projects you shoot. 200mm Astrobin photos (not taken by me): https://www.astrobin.m USM F2.8 L II The 135mm focal length is absolutely perfect for the Heart and Soul Nebulae if youre using a crop sensor DSLR camera. The aperture ring is marked with each f-stop, and you need to manually click through F/2 F/22 and watch the blades do their work. But If you want the "look" you get with a medium telephoto at f/2, hen all those negatives become irrelevant. I use it routinely in preference to many other multicoated filters I tested, including the new Hoya MC UV. I rarely shoot static landscapes or posed, composed images. Sure, the Nifty 50 is an incredible value (and a LOT cheaper), but the 135mm puts you within range of some of the best astrophotography targets in the night sky. It's small, light, cheap and extremely wide but is it any good? Fantastic IQ & Bokeh. It would not surprise me if modern lenses were useable at full aperture. Everyone should have one? Seems to me that with your gallery and website of images you should refrain from passing judgment on who is and isn't a photography master. So, let's see where it falls short of perfection: It turns out that this. Some people like these, and consider them decorative. We have come to accept that most lenses are strong in only one or two of these three factors, that I personally focus on when researching lenses to buy. it is crisp, fast, and awsome. All of them are extremely sharp and produce mouth-watering bokeh, and all of them are reasonably priced for what you get.". In between interviews with executives of the major companies, Dale Baskin took to the show floor to bring you this report. (on a full frame camera)Wonderful lens for some portraiture applications, sporting events and candids at a party or event. Better than nothing I guess, would depend on how much it raises the price. Here's what I see from the photographs:#1: Woman in traffic. Yuri toropin tests a bunch of lenses on Flickr which is a great source. its useful to keep in mind these bokeh circles are the result of light sources bright lamps from autos Christmas lights streetlamps etc and are seriously overused in articles on lenses with strong subject\ backround seperations, they approach parody in the way they characterise subject separation, for most purposes and in most portrait situations its less highlight dominant backrounds that grace a photo. I had a 70-200 f/4 that i used unstopped at 200 with awesome results. (purchased for $845), reviewed November 16th, 2005 Because it manage to do so. Yes, because it is not f/2. Perhaps I missed it, but did you use a clip-in light pollution filter with your 60D and this lens? At 135mm, you can get really creative about the object or objects you shoot and where you position them within the frame. You are entitled to your opinions, and I respect that! Far from being a generic run-of-the-mill image hosting website, it was created and is still operated by an astrophotographer, and boasts features that are very specific to astrophotography. Weight. This is huge for me, as it allows me to be much more nimble with getting the right composition and angle. Rokinon 135mm F2.0 ED Lens. It is a parade of photos that should have been galled out after a boring Sunday afternoon shoot of "Think I'll bring along a camera when I walk the dog", There are so many things wrong in this 'review' -- most of all the idea that 'you' should get this lens and somehow it magically makes the duck or the cat stuck right in the center of picture a great photo! #light_bulb I would disagree. (purchased for $1,000), reviewed January 1st, 2007 The flat lens hood is great for taking flat frames after a night of astrophotography. Its a joy to work with every time. tanie i dobre opinie 9 opatek lub Biznes HUMAN Sport Insect Architektura Specjalne Krajobrazy Martwa natura Podry People 2023 Obiektyw o staej ogniskowej Thats quite a jump from 135mm, so the camera body you use with this lens may change the types of targets you shoot. I liked the extra versatility of the zoom and the ability to shoot at 200mm. Used on a crop body the results are still splendid but you gain on DOF, making it a great combination for wedding/event and ambient/available light. So now your 42Mpix A7rII is only a 10.5Mpix. I typically shoot with Canon lenses, but the potential for low light photography (whether thats astrophotography or the ability to film at dusk) caught my interest. I just love the lightning fast & accurate focus of this lens. I would only recommend this lens for casual photographers where missed shot means nothing. However, when my Canon "L" lenses are used at f8 they are all very sharp and the 135L does not blow the others away. Is this Nikon already, Astro modified, without need for H alpha filters or any further modifications? Still, what a time to be an enthusiast/photog, so many nice options. This image of NGC 7000 was done at F/4 at iso 800 with a Canon 20D mod. Youll never have to worry about losing your position just by touching the lens, but you can always tape the position down to be sure. when you hold the lens in your hand you know you are holding a fine peice of optical equipment. Were those taken with the Canon telephotos you spoke of, and the full spectrum modified camera and the clip in filter? We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder. I hope that this post has provided some practical insight into a popular camera lens for astrophotography. Sharp, handy, strong colours and contrast. Tiring. In the past, Ive covered a number of different lenses, from the Sigma 24mm F/1.4 to the Canon EF 300mm F/4L. There are a lot of photo/video cameras that have found a role as B-cameras on professional film productions or even A-cameras for amateur and independent productions. Just not useful if you already have traditional focal lengths. I had both for a while. The cat is a case for the bit bucket i my opinion - it has no composition, a distracting background and a random parts of the body in focus - the same picture made with a smart phone could not look worse. Today I want to talk about another such lens design: The 135mm F2 lens. Stuff I used to take the photos. Explore the sky, try frame some targets and see what works well with your DSLR and lens combination. It's bokeh is comparable to the 85mm 1.2 but IMO not as nice. You can barely tell it's a pond.#3: Duck.Birds with bokeh are fine. And yet this review is on front page of DPReview prompting me to go and buy this lens -- so surely it must be a professional , well grounded review, right? I was expecting a lot more of an article that says "the best telephoto lenses for astrophotography". No, Mr. Instead it means the style of rendering. Target for bortle 9 astrophotography? So.. its like there is one F stop not being used by the lens..how do you know what click is for what F stop?? The focuser adjustment ring on the Rokinon 135mm F/2 is excellent, but fine-tuning your critical focus on a bright star at F/2 will take some trial and error to get right. That setup will give you all that you really need. D8XX cameras, subject isolation and quality of bokeh.Zoom lenses can not hold a candle to such primes. Here is a recent ones taken with the canon xs and a lens. Thanks, F2 allows higher shutter speeds in lower light without raising the ISO. The Sadr Region in Cygnus, including the Crescent Nebula by Eric Cauble.
Serena Williams Foundation,
Maria Regina Drivers Ed Summer 2021,
Bmw Spia Motore Gialla Accesa,
Articles C
