irc v pemsel

The Council sought charitable status for its activities of reporting the law. [62] They can also remove trustees on the grounds of bankruptcy, mental incapacity, failure to act or the trustee's absence from the country. Commissioners of Special Purposes of Income Tax v Pemsel Lord MacNagthen classified the recognized purposes of charitable trust into four heads: i) relief of poverty ii) advancement of education iii) advancement of religion iv) other purposes beneficial to the communities . The Pemsel Case Foundation is hiring a part-time Executive Director for a two-year renewable period. The law is absolutely clear on this, however the inconsistencies have occurred in the application of the law. The other problem is that it may be seen as a class within a class as in case of IRC v Baddeley (1955). He represents the beneficial interest; it follows that in all proceedings in which the beneficial interest has to be before the court, he must be a party. .Cited Incorporated Council of Law Reporting For England And Wales v Attorney-General And Others CA 14-Oct-1971 The Council sought charitable status for its activities of reporting the law. The Act also lays out what kinds of activities are in the "interest of social welfare", stating in Section 1(2) that it is where the facilities "are provided with the object of improving the conditions of life for the persons for whom the facilities are primarily provided" and in Section 1(2)(a) "those persons have need of such facilities as aforesaid by reason of their youth, age, infirmity or disablement, poverty or social and economic circumstances", or where, in Section 1(2)(b) "the facilities are available to members of the public at large". charities for the rights of Disabled people. 5 minutes know interesting legal mattersIRC v Pemsel [1891] AC 531 HL (UK Caselaw) The courts have added to the list of purposes which are accepted as charitable and in 1891 Lord McNaughton (Pemsel Case 1891 Ac 531) classified four heads for charitable purposes. [68] Schemes may also be used to fix administrative difficulties caused by uncertainty, as in Re Gott,[69] or even to completely defeat the gift. [37] The second sub-category is for charitable trusts relating to animals. This appears to indicate that a millionaire who loses half of his income may be considered "poor", in that he is unable to have the lifestyle he is accustomed to. Cited - Income Tax Special Commissioners v Pemsel HL 20-Jul-1891. This extends to the support of religious buildings and sick or old members of the clergy, as in Re Forster. [72] Prior to the Charities Act 1960, this "failed purpose" situation was the only time when cy-pres could be applied; it required the original purpose to be impossible or impractical. IRC v Baddeley [1955] AC 572, 585 by Will Chen 2.I or your money back Check out our premium contract notes! Trust for relief of property. .Cited Lehtimaki and Others v Cooper SC 29-Jul-2020 Charitable Company- Directors Status and Duties A married couple set up a charitable foundation to assist children in developing countries. [8], The first definition of a "charitable purpose" was found in the preamble to the Charitable Uses Act 1601. [60], The next significant role is played by the charity trustees, defined in Section 97 of the 1993 Act as those persons having the general control and management of the administration of charities. Again, this excludes trusts which isolate the beneficiaries from the public, as in Re Grove-Grady,[38] where the trust sought to provide "a refuge [for animals] so that they shall be safe from molestation and destruction by man". We are not, I think, without a guide. . The first of these "sub-categories" contains trusts for the benefit of the sick and old; the Preamble to the 1601 Act gave "aged, impotent and poor people" as acceptable beneficiaries for a charity. Determining whether institutions are or are not charities. You must then, as in other sciences, reason by analogy, or leave at least one-half of the statute without effect. It was argued that, although the words charity and charitable had a definite legal meaning in England, they could not be applied in the same way in Scotland unless they had a definite legal meaning there too: That was not Lord Hardwickes view. Lord Herschell: I certainly cannot think that they . The guiding principles in such cases are as follows: where connecting word is or this is construed disjunctively which means the trust is not to be regarded as exclusively charitable e.g. In Dingle v Turner,[18] a charitable trust was established to help poor employees of Dingle & Co. It has been argued that there has been a weakening in the courts attitude to purportedly charitable trusts recently. If the gift is given after death through a will, the will must comply with Section 9 of the Wills Act 1837, which requires that the will be in writing and signed by the testator (or somebody else present, at the testator's instruction), it is clear that the testator intended to give effect to the will, and the signature is made or noted by two or more witnesses. That degree of uncertainty in the law must be admitted.Lord Simonds said: Nowhere perhaps did the favour shown by the law to charities exhibit itself more clearly than in the development of the doctrine of general charitable intention, under which the court, finding in a bequest (often, as I humbly think, on a flimsy pretext) a general charitable intention, disregarded the fact that the named object was against the policy of the law . The first is that, even when a campaign for political change is stated to be for the benefit of the community, it is not within the court's competence to decide whether or not the change would be beneficial. In this Equity Short, Dr John Picton discusses the legacy of Special Commissioners of Income Tax v Pemsel [1891] A C 531. 2 Commissioners for Special Purposes of Income Tax v Pemsel [1891] AC 531; " the words 'charity' and 'charitable' bear, for . [74], Failures that lead to an application for cy-pres are of two sorts; subsequent failure, where the trust, constituted properly, failed after a period of action, and initial failure, where the trust fails at creation. There is also room for organisations to get charitable status even if campaigning is a major part of their work if it is set out appropriately in the governing document e.g. Free resources to assist you with your legal studies! After the war he became one of the very few senior officers who served in the Wehrmacht to serve in the West German Army. Basing himself in the Preamble, Lord Macnaghten sought to extract from it a generalised classification of what constitutes charitable in the landmark case Commissioners of Income Tax v Pemsel (1891), which resulted in the following four-fold divisions: Trusts for the relief of poverty Trusts for the advancement of education Trusts for the .Explained In re Macduff; Macduff v Macduff CA 1896 Lindley LJ qualified the judgment of Lord Macnaghten in Pemsel: Now Sir Samuel Romilly did not mean, and I am certain Lord Macnaghten did not mean, to say that every object of public general utility must necessarily be a charity. However in, the first gift the courts may feel that the unemployed may not be a large section of the public as this depends on the economy of the country. The general public benefit rule in the "poverty" category is that "gifts for the relief of poverty among poor people of a particular description" is charitable; "gifts to particular persons, the relief of poverty being the motive of the gift" are not.[19]. This legal concept has been applied and adapted over the centuries by the judiciary in both the United Kingdom and Australia. [51] This line is considered by the Charity Commission in their official guidelines, which allow the Commission to look at the wider purpose of the organisation when deciding if it constitutes a valid charity. [42], Charitable trusts have historically been invalid if they include "purely recreational pastimes", as in IRC v City of Glasgow Police Athletic Association;[43] even though the purpose of the charity was to improve the efficiency of the police force, the fact that this included a recreational element invalidated the trust. Any case involving charities has him joined as a party, he may act against trustees in disputes, and take actions to recover property from third parties. And the converse case may be possible. Section 1(1) of the Act, however, preserves the need to provide a "public benefit". [57] The Census of 1861 recorded his occupation as a Commercial Clerk, at Manchester Shipping House. Each of an organization's purposes must be clearly stated in its governing document, such as letters patent, articles of incorporation, trust, or constitution. The most important feature here is that the Charities Act 2006 removes the presumption, it provides s3(2), the public benefit requirement must be demonstrated in all cases, not just in the first three heads of Lord Macnaghtens classification. When the marriage failed an attempt was made to establish a second foundation with funds from the first, as part of W leaving the Trust. [34][35], Macnaghten's fourth category contains not only individual categories of its own, but also general principles that are applied when a body seeks to be recognised as a charitable trust. The company should have . He also gave the definition of research required for a gift to be valid: The word education must be used in a wide sense, certainly extending beyond teaching, and the requirement is that, in order to be charitable, research must either be of educational value to the researcher or must be so directed as to lead to something which will pass into the store of educational material, or so as to improve the sum of communicable knowledge in an area which education must cover - education in this last context extending to the formation of literary taste and appreciation.[23]. Peggs v Lamb [1994] 2 WLR 1. There is no statutory definition of what a charity is; it is instead dealt with in a roundabout way. swarb.co.uk is published by David Swarbrick of 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse, West Yorkshire, HD6 2AG. The trusts affected were trusts for . First the purpose must be charitable as in s2(2). N.B. and Paula J. Thomas, B.A., LL.B. A-G [1972]: law reports = educational t/f yes London Hospital Medical College v IRC [1976] ; AG v Ross [1986]: Student unions/organisations ancillary to education t/f yes. *You can also browse our support articles here >. To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below: UK law covers the laws and legislation of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. Registered office: Creative Tower, Fujairah, PO Box 4422, UAE. make a difference between campaigning and political activity. As mentioned, the Attorney General represents the beneficiaries as a parens patriae, appearing on the part of The Crown. Charities for the purpose of creating animal sanctuaries usually pass the public benefit test despite this, because they do not completely exclude the public and often have educational value. Hence they have the power to recognise new purposes as charitable where they believe the courts would do so. the object of repealing the Act of 1876 was a main object, if not the main object, of the Society, to obtain an alteration of the law. Seeking an amendment of acts of parliament, or even their repeal, where that is ancillary to one of the established charitable objects in common law did not deprive an organisation of its charitable status. As a result, the trust failed. When deciding if a gift has failed, there is a distinction made between gifts to unincorporated bodies and incorporated bodies, as laid down in Re Vernon's Will Trust. Academics Richard Edwards and Nigel Stockwell argue that this is because allowing such trusts to exist relieves the rest of society for having to provide for poor people; as a result, there is "public benefit" in a wider way. "Education" also includes research, as long as the subject is useful and the gift makes some requirement that the information be made available to others and disseminated. The modern conception of what is meant by the terms 'charity' and 'charitable' was established in 1891 by Lord Macnaghten in Commissioner for Special Purposes of Income Tax v Pemsel ('Pemsel's case'). The Political Activities and Campaigning by Charities (2004) states a charitable may engage in political activity where to do so will enhance or facilitate or support its work.. For Laura gift to be classified as a Charity it must fall within s3(1) Charities Act 1993, where the Charity Commission keeps a Register of institutions that are charities. The nature of charitable trusts means that the definition of "public benefit" varies between Macnaghten's four categories.[12]. Where the Commission feels there has been mismanagement or maladministration, it can sanction the trustees, removing them, appointing new ones or temporarily taking the trust property itself to prevent harm being done. .Cited Davidson v Scottish Ministers HL 15-Dec-2005 The complainant a prisoner sought an order that he should not be kept in conditions found to be inhumane. This has two implications: first, [61] Jurisdiction over charitable disputes is shared equally between the High Court of Justice and the Charity Commission. Royal Choir Society v IRC [1943] A trust for the promotion and practice of a choir was upheld as charitable. This article questions whether in the area of poor relief equity acts out of a humanitarian regard for those whose relief is the purpose of the trust, or whether there is a more . A charitable organization or charity is an organization whose primary objectives are philanthropy and social well-being (e.g. However the head does consider a wide range of activities as said in the case of McGovern v AG 1982 contribute to the improvement of a useful branch of human knowledge and its public dissemination. The leading case of McGovern v AG (1982) sets out the principles on which a court will typically find research work to be charitable. Before making any decision, you must read the full case report and take professional advice as appropriate. There are exceptions where it is not practicable, as in Re Coxon,[58] where of a 200,000 gift to the City of London for charitable purposes, a 100 dinner and other small gifts to the board of trustees was funded. A Notice of Reference dated 27 January 2011 was made by Her Majesty's Attorney General following concerns expressed by the Charity Commission that the Charities Act 2006 (2006 Act) had cast doubt on the continued charitable status of certain charitable trusts. If the gift was charitable, the gift would be applied cy pres, but if not it would fail and pass to the family and be subect to Inheritance Tax. Charitable trusts, as with other trusts, are administered by trustees, but there is no relationship between the trustees and the beneficiaries. The doctrine originated in ecclesiastical law, the name coming as a contraction of the Norman French cy pres comme possible (as close as possible),[71] and is typically used where the original purpose of the charity has failed, and results in the trust purpose being altered to the nearest realistic alternative. .Cited Guild v Inland Revenue Commissioners HL 6-May-1992 The will left land for a sports centre to a local authority which no longer existed. Furthermore, if a trust for research is to constitute a valid trust for the advancement of education, it is no necessary either (a) that the teacher/pupil relationship should be in contemplation, or (b) that the persons to benefit from the knowledge to be acquired should be persons who are already in the course of receiving an education in the conventional sense. [23], For artistic pursuits, it is not enough to promote such things generally, as it is too vague. As with poverty, this category is also found in the 1601 Act's preamble, which refers to charities established for the "Maintenance of Schools of Learning, Free Schools, and Scholars at Universities". Blair v Duncan (1902), AG v National Provincial Bank (1924) etc where the word and is used, this is ordinarily construed conjunctively so that the word of wider import is drawn into the ambit of charitable e.g. The second approach is a requirement that there is no personal nexus between the settler and the class of people to be benefited, but that there has to be sufficient public benefit e.g. Some limits were set to this provision by Lord Simonds in IRC v Baddeley,[15] where he wrote that: There may be a good charity for the relief of persons who are not in grinding need or utter destitution but relief connotes need of some sort, either need for a home, or for the means to provide for some necessity or quasi-necessity, and not merely for an amusement, however healthy. National Anti-Vivisection Society v IRC (BAILII: [1947] UKHL 4) [1948] AC 31 ; Nelson v Nelson (1995) 184 CLR 538 (Australia) Nestle v National Westminster Bank (BAILII: [1992] EWCA Civ 12) [1993] 1 WLR 1260, [1994] 1 All ER 118 ; Neville Estates v Madden [1962] Ch 832 ; Neville Estates v Madden[1962] Ch 832 (ICLR) In the latter but not the former case the reference to non-charitable activities will deprive the trust of its charitable status. This allows the charitable element to take effect. In my opinion both Lauras gifts will be given the charitable status. There are three tests to be satisfied in order for Lauras gifts to be classed as a charitable purpose. It provides for situations where political activity can be carried out, in order to support the delivery of its charitable purposes. View examples of our professional work here. However it does stress that the political activity must only be done in order to support the delivery of its charitable purpose. as Lord Hailsham pointed out in IRC v McMullen5, the law must change as ideas about social values change. * TERRANCE S. CARTER Carters Professional Corporation, Orangeville, Ontario Assisted by Anne-Marie Langan, B.A., B.S.W., LL.B. Individuals who donate via Gift Aid are free from paying tax on that amount, while companies who give gifts to charity can claim tax on the amount back from HM Revenue & Customs.[6]. Cited - Incorporated Council of Law Reporting For England And Wales v Attorney-General And Others CA 14-Oct-1971. Court approval was . It has often been assumed that the notion of altruism indicative in the ordinary use of the term 'charity' penetrates the rationale for equity's enforcement of charitable trusts for the relief of the poor. If the gift is of land and made during the donor's lifetime, it must comply with Section 53(1)(b) of the Law of Property Act 1925, which requires that the agreement be a written document signed by the person giving it. Charitable Purposes used with technical meaning. [10], Trusts must also be for "public benefit", which was considered at length in Oppenheim v Tobacco Securities Trust. Biography. Southwood v Attorney General (2000) TLR 18/7 /2000. If the money is to be spent on non-charitable purposes, the trust fails, regardless of the fact that it applies to a particular area. The trusts last referred to are not the less charitable in the eye of the law, because incidentally they benefit the rich as well as the poor, as indeed, every charity that deserves the name must do either directly or indirectly.Lord MacNaghten contrasted the systems of administrative law in England and Scotland: By expounding the Act by analogy, and if you will apply your usual penetration to this point, you will find that there is often no other possible way of making a consistent sensible construction upon statutes conceived in general words, which are to have their operation upon the respective laws of two countries, the rules and forms whereof are different. Updated: 24 August 2021; Ref: scu.220235. Case law Income Tax Commissioners v Pemsel [1891] Gilmour v Coats McGovern v A-G [1982] Oppenheim v Tobacco Securities Trust Co Ltd [1950] National Anti-Vivisection Society v IRC [1947] Dingle v Turner [1972] Independent Schools Council v Charity Commission [2011] A-G v Charity Commission for England and Wales [2012] . Trust for the advancement of education. Held: The Employment Appeal Tribunal was wrong to find an error of law in the decision of the Employment Tribunal to extend time; but the court declined to . Max-Josef Pemsel (15 January 1897 - 30 June 1985) was a Generalleutnant in the German Army during Second World War.After the war he became one of the very few senior officers from the Nazi Germany-era armed forces to serve in the West German Army.. The issue occurred again in the case of McGovern v Att-Gen 1982 where Amnesty International sought to seek charitable status for part of its organisation. Tel: 0795 457 9992, or email david@swarb.co.uk, Mayor of Lyons v East India Co: PC 12 Dec 1836, CC255132002 (Unreported): AIT 30 Jun 2003, Reclaiming Motion In Petition of Scott Davidson for Judicial Review of A Decision To Continue To Detain the Prisoner In Inhuman and Degrading Prison C, Inland Revenue Commissioners v Glasgow Police Athletic Association, OBrien v Department for Constitutional Affairs, Helena Partnerships Ltd v HM Revenue and Customs, Incorporated Council of Law Reporting For England And Wales v Attorney-General And Others, National Anti-Vivisection League v Inland Revenue Commissioners, British Airways Plc v British Airline Pilots Association: QBD 23 Jul 2019, Wright v Troy Lucas (A Firm) and Another: QBD 15 Mar 2019, Hayes v Revenue and Customs (Income Tax Loan Interest Relief Disallowed): FTTTx 23 Jun 2020, Ashbolt and Another v Revenue and Customs and Another: Admn 18 Jun 2020, Indian Deluxe Ltd v Revenue and Customs (Income Tax/Corporation Tax : Other): FTTTx 5 Jun 2020, Productivity-Quality Systems Inc v Cybermetrics Corporation and Another: QBD 27 Sep 2019, Thitchener and Another v Vantage Capital Markets Llp: QBD 21 Jun 2019, McCarthy v Revenue and Customs (High Income Child Benefit Charge Penalty): FTTTx 8 Apr 2020, HU206722018 and HU196862018: AIT 17 Mar 2020, Parker v Chief Constable of the Hampshire Constabulary: CA 25 Jun 1999, Christofi v Barclays Bank Plc: CA 28 Jun 1999, Demite Limited v Protec Health Limited; Dayman and Gilbert: CA 24 Jun 1999, Demirkaya v Secretary of State for Home Department: CA 23 Jun 1999, Aravco Ltd and Others, Regina (on the application of) v Airport Co-Ordination Ltd: CA 23 Jun 1999, Manchester City Council v Ingram: CA 25 Jun 1999, London Underground Limited v Noel: CA 29 Jun 1999, Shanley v Mersey Docks and Harbour Company General Vargos Shipping Inc: CA 28 Jun 1999, Warsame and Warsame v London Borough of Hounslow: CA 25 Jun 1999, Millington v Secretary of State for Environment Transport and Regions v Shrewsbury and Atcham Borough Council: CA 25 Jun 1999, Chilton v Surrey County Council and Foakes (T/A R F Mechanical Services): CA 24 Jun 1999, Oliver v Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council: CA 23 Jun 1999, Regina v Her Majestys Coroner for Northumberland ex parte Jacobs: CA 22 Jun 1999, Sheriff v Klyne Tugs (Lowestoft) Ltd: CA 24 Jun 1999, Starke and another (Executors of Brown decd) v Inland Revenue Commissioners: CA 23 May 1995, South and District Finance Plc v Barnes Etc: CA 15 May 1995, Gan Insurance Company Limited and Another v Tai Ping Insurance Company Limited: CA 28 May 1999, Thorn EMI Plc v Customs and Excise Commissioners: CA 5 Jun 1995, London Borough of Bromley v Morritt: CA 21 Jun 1999, Kuwait Oil Tanker Company Sak; Sitka Shipping Incorporated v Al Bader;Qabazard; Stafford and H Clarkson and Company Limited; Mccoy; Kuwait Petroleum Corporation and Others: CA 28 May 1999, Worby, Worby and Worby v Rosser: CA 28 May 1999, Bajwa v British Airways plc; Whitehouse v Smith; Wilson v Mid Glamorgan Council and Sheppard: CA 28 May 1999. These vary depending on whether the gift that creates the trust is given in life, given after death, or includes land. (MacNaghten) 1891 Charities Act 2006 The Charity Commission originated as the Charity Commissioners, created by the Charitable Trusts Act 1853 to provide advice to charitable trusts. If these are all carried out, the will is a valid document, and the gift made as part of it can create a charitable trust. .if(typeof ez_ad_units != 'undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'swarb_co_uk-medrectangle-4','ezslot_8',113,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-swarb_co_uk-medrectangle-4-0'); Lists of cited by and citing cases may be incomplete. Court approval was . Giving information or advice to any Minister of the Crown with regard to the Commission's functions or meeting of its objectives. [29] The 2006 Act expanded this, noting that religion "includes.. a religion which does not involve belief in a god". As a form of express trust, charitable trusts are subject to certain formalities, as well as the requirements of the three certainties, when being created. The case arose from a decision of the Inland Revenue Commissioners to restrict the types of [49], The leading case, Anti-Vivisection Society, sets out a strict rule that charities cannot campaign politically. [13] "Poverty" is a subjective term, and in Re Coulthurst,[14] Sir Raymond Evershed indicated that it should be treated as such; "poverty, of course, does not mean destitution it [means] persons who have to 'go short' due regard being had to their status in life and so forth". The Charities Act 2006 states in section 1(1) that: For the purposes of the law of England and Wales, 'charity' means an institution which (a) is established for charitable purposes only, and (b) falls to be subject to the control of the High Court in the exercise of its jurisdiction with respect to charities. The issue between the approaches falls down to whether Lord Crosss approach which requires a intrinsically charitable in the creation of a trust or as with the Compton approach which requires just a evidential issue of showing that there is a predominantly public benefit rather than a private benefit, is correct. Info: 2112 words (8 pages) Essay The problem of trust failing on this test is largely due to bad drafting. Tel: 0795 457 9992, or email david@swarb.co.uk. The House of Lords found that size was not the issue; the group did not count as a section of the public because of the "personal nexus", or common relationship, between the settlors (British American Tobacco) and the beneficiaries. .Cited Helena Partnerships Ltd v HM Revenue and Customs CA 9-May-2012 helena_hmrcCA2012 The company had undertaken substantial building works and sought associated tax relief. Pemsel's case informed us, in an authoritative decision in 1891, that the words "charitable Athletic purposes" in a Finance Act (also applicable to Scotland) must be construed according to the legal and technical meaning given to those words by English law. In Pemsel's Case, Lord Macnaghten adopted Romilly's classification system. IRC v Baddeley (1955) -a trust which provided outlet for members . With the 1960 Act (the relevant provisions of which are now included in the 1993 Act), cy-pres can be applied where the original purposes have: (a)been as far as may be fulfilled; or cannot be carried out, or not according to the directions given and to the spirit of the gift; (b) or where the original purposes provide a use for part only of the property available by virtue of the gift; (c) where the property available by virtue of the gift and other property applicable for similar purposes can be more effectively used in conjunction, and to that end can suitably, regard being had to the spirit of the gift, be made applicable to common purposes; (d) or where the original purposes were laid down by reference to an area which then was but has ceased to be a unit for some other purpose, or by reference to a class of persons or to an area which has for any reason since ceased to be suitable, regard being had to the spirit of the gift, or to be practical in administering the gift; (e) or where the original purposes, in whole or in part, have since they were laid down been adequately provided for by other means; or ceased, as being useless or harmful to the community or for other reasons, to be in law charitable; or ceased in any other way to provide a suitable and effective method of using the property available by virtue of the gift, regarding being had to the spirit of the gift. Copyright 2003 - 2023 - LawTeacher is a trading name of Business Bliss Consultants FZE, a company registered in United Arab Emirates. The explanation seems to lie in the way that Lord Macnaghten expressed 8 e.g. Born on 15 January 1897 in Regensburg, Bavaria, Pemsel entered the German Army during the First World War in April 1916 as a volunteer. Please see the Job Posting for details. )Hence Lauras gift should have no problems. His role was discussed in Brooks v Richardson,[61] where the court quoted the practitioner's text Tudor on Charity: By reason of his duty as the Sovereign's representative protecting all the persons interested in the charity funds, the Attorney-General is as a general rule a necessary party to charity proceeding. Under the Charities Act 2006 Section 2, thirteen heads of charitable purposes are listed. For a discussion of the different shades of meanings in these terms, see Hkon . The Commission also acts as the Official Custodian for Charities, who acts as a trustee for charities at the direction of the Commission. Scottish Burial Reform and Cremation Society Ltd v Glasgow City Corporation [1968] AC 138. The public benefit requirement as stemmed from cases such Williams Trustees v IRC (1947) where it was held that a trust for the benefit of Welsh people in London was not charitable since they did not form an appreciable section of the community.

Sturgeon Lake, Mn Obituaries, Nr2003 Save Game Editor, Articles I